1. Home
  2. Capture, Trial & Execution

Capture, Trial
& Execution
1933 – 1934

The last eleven months of Surya Sen’s life are the best-documented part of it, because the colonial state was writing them down. This page follows the record: an arrest, a special tribunal, an appeal, and a morning in January 1934.

Arrested 16 February 1933 Sentenced 14 August 1933 Appeal dismissed 14 November 1933 Executed 12 January 1934

01Underground

01 Underground

April 1930 – February 1933

Thirty-four months in the countryside

After the withdrawal from Chittagong and the defeat at Jalalabad, Surya Sen was not caught. He remained at large in the district for almost three years, moving between villages and depending on households willing to shelter a man the government had put a price on.

The period cost the movement its field commanders. Ramkrishna Biswas was hanged in August 1931. At Dhalghat in June 1932, Nirmal Sen and Apurba Sen were killed covering Surya Sen’s escape from a house surrounded by troops. In September 1932 Pritilata Waddedar died at Pahartali. Each loss narrowed the circle of people who knew where their leader was — and made the remaining circle more valuable to the police.

By the beginning of 1933 the organisation had been reduced to a small number of people in a small area, protected by nothing except the willingness of neighbours not to speak.

The arrest

16 February 1933

Surya Sen was arrested on 16 February 1933 at a house in the Gairala area of Chittagong district. He was not tracked down. He was given up: Netra Sen, who was within reach of the network, informed the police where he could be found. Netra Sen was killed by revolutionaries before the reward reached him.

Kalpana Datta, who was with the group that night, escaped. She was arrested three months later, on 19 May 1933 — the same day Tarakeswar Dastidar was taken after an armed encounter with police at Gahira.

With those three arrests, the Chittagong organisation effectively ended. It had survived three years of pursuit, the loss of most of its commanders and a large standing reward. It did not survive one person deciding to talk.

That is a genuinely uncomfortable ending, and it is the one the record gives. The compartmented structure that had protected the plan of April 1930 could raise the price of betrayal; nothing in it could make betrayal impossible.

03The tribunal

03 The tribunal

1933 · the legal record

Not an ordinary court

Surya Sen was tried by commissioners appointed under the Bengal Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1925 — the special political jurisdiction the province had created eight years earlier, and the same statute under which he had been detained in 1926.

The charges brought against Surya Sen, Tarakeswar Dastidar and Kalpana Datta included conspiracy to wage war against the King and waging war against the King — the gravest offences in the Indian Penal Code — together with abetment of murder, attempted murder, and offences under the Arms Act and the Explosive Substances Act.

On 14 August 1933 the commissioners sentenced Surya Sen and Tarakeswar Dastidar to death, and Kalpana Datta to transportation for life.

The appeals were heard by the Calcutta High Court and decided on 14 November 1933. The court dismissed them. It upheld the convictions with a single exception — setting aside those under one section of the Explosive Substances Act — and confirmed both death sentences.

The charge of waging war matters more than it may appear. It was the state’s formal answer to the claim made at the police armoury on 18 April 1930. The revolutionaries had proclaimed a provisional government and taken a salute; the tribunal recorded a conspiracy and a series of crimes. The whole political argument of the Chittagong uprising is contained in that disagreement about which word applied.

The last day

12 January 1934

Surya Sen and Tarakeswar Dastidar were hanged at Chittagong.

Surya Sen was thirty-nine. Tarakeswar Dastidar was in his mid-twenties. On 11 January 1934, the day before, Surya Sen wrote a final letter to his comrades. It asks them to remember 18 April 1930 and the people who died for a free India.

It is the only extended statement in his own words that is widely reproduced, and it survives as a translation from Bengali in published accounts rather than as a document this archive can point to in a collection.

Death is knocking at my door. My mind is flying away towards eternity…
Surya Sen · 11 January 1934
On what is said about his final weeks Published accounts of the Chittagong movement, including those written after independence, state that Surya Sen and Tarakeswar Dastidar were severely ill-treated in custody before the execution, and that his body was not returned to his family. These accounts are widely repeated and are recorded here as such. This archive has not verified them against contemporary official documents, and it does not reproduce the graphic detail that some retellings dwell on. What can be stated from the record without qualification is the date, the place, and the sentence that was carried out.

05Afterwards

05 Afterwards

1934 onwards

What was left, and what happened to it

The executions of 12 January 1934 closed the Chittagong movement as an organisation. Its leader and his successor were dead; its earlier commanders were in the Cellular Jail at Port Blair, where most remained until 1946; Kalpana Datta served until 1939.

Those who came out of prison did not return to armed politics. Ganesh Ghosh, Ambika Chakrabarty and Kalpana Datta all joined the Communist Party of India and entered electoral politics: Ghosh to the West Bengal Legislative Assembly from 1952 and the Lok Sabha from 1967; Chakrabarty to the Bengal and West Bengal assemblies in 1946 and 1952; Datta to an unsuccessful assembly candidacy in Chittagong in 1946.

Ananta Singh’s later course was different and remains contested: after independence he returned to armed political organisation in West Bengal in the late 1960s and was imprisoned again from 1969 to 1977.

The survivors also became the movement’s historians. Kalpana Datta’s reminiscences appeared in 1945, while several of her comrades were still in prison; Ananta Singh wrote at length in Bengali. Much of what is known about the inside of the Chittagong group comes from people who had every reason to remember it generously — which is the reason this site distinguishes between what the tribunals recorded and what the participants recalled.

Surya Sen’s memory, meanwhile, went somewhere his organisation could not follow it.